Full Library
Conceptualizing non-cognitive attributes, entrepreneurship training, pedagogical competencies and stem education outcome: an integrated model and research proposition.
Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
- Mwasiaji, Evans (Author)
- Mambo, Shadrack (Author)
- Mse, Godfrey S. (Author)
- Okumu, John (Author)
Title
Conceptualizing non-cognitive attributes, entrepreneurship training, pedagogical competencies and stem education outcome: an integrated model and research proposition.
Abstract
Literature on STEM education outcome in the tertiary context has pursued the construct of non-cognitive attributes distinctly from that of entrepreneurship skills and pedagogical competencies, notwithstanding the inferred indications that the three can be adapted in an integrated model to enhance positive outcomes. This study established that there is a range of approaches seeking to optimize positive learning outcomes in tertiary level institutions. This paper argues that there is need to incorporate entrepreneurship and pedagogical skills training in the curriculum for STEM educators at the tertiary level institutions. The study has therefore proposed an integrated theoretical model which can be used to generate data sets to address identified gaps.
Publication
Conceptualizing non-cognitive attributes, entrepreneurship training, pedagogical competencies and stem education outcome: an integrated model and research proposition.
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
1925-1939
Date
2022-07-01
Language
English
ISSN
09577572
Extra
an: 157714655; source: International Journal of Technology & Design Education; docTypes: Article; pubTypes: Academic Journal;
Citation
Mwasiaji, E., Mambo, S., Mse, G. S., & Okumu, J. (2022). Conceptualizing non-cognitive attributes, entrepreneurship training, pedagogical competencies and stem education outcome: an integrated model and research proposition. Conceptualizing Non-Cognitive Attributes, Entrepreneurship Training, Pedagogical Competencies and Stem Education Outcome: An Integrated Model and Research Proposition., 32(3), 1925–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09671-9
Publication type
Link to this record