Learning barriers among Grade 6 pupils attending rural schools in Uganda: implications to policy and practice.

Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
Title
Learning barriers among Grade 6 pupils attending rural schools in Uganda: implications to policy and practice.
Abstract
The paper uses multilevel analysis procedures to examine individual- and group-level learning barriers that have the greatest impact on pupil achievement in Uganda. The data for this study were collected in 2014 among 2711 Grade 6 pupils attending 82 schools in two rural districts of Iganga and Mayuge in Uganda. Data used in this paper are part of a larger study which sought to examine the schooling patterns, as well as the quality of education received by children living in rural settlements in Uganda. Among the learning barriers with the greatest impact on pupil achievement at the individual-level were lack of parental involvement, lack of pre-primary school attendance, grade repetition, and lack of basic learning resources such as writing materials. At the school-level, the barriers with the most impact on pupil achievement were lack of teacher lesson preparedness, lack of teacher-classroom support by subject advisors, distance between school and teachers' place of residence, lack of basic classroom resources, and whether or not the teacher kept pupil learning progress records. Implications of the findings for policy and practice are outlined.
Publication
Learning barriers among Grade 6 pupils attending rural schools in Uganda: implications to policy and practice.
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
129-155
Date
20170601
Language
English
ISSN
15702081
Extra
an: 122897600; source: Educational Research for Policy & Practice; docTypes: Article; pubTypes: Academic Journal;
Citation
Hungi, N., Ngware, M., Mahuro, G., & Muhia, N. (20170601). Learning barriers among Grade 6 pupils attending rural schools in Uganda: implications to policy and practice. Learning Barriers among Grade 6 Pupils Attending Rural Schools in Uganda: Implications to Policy and Practice., 16(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-016-9199-2